THE SITE AND THE EXCAVATIONS
Apollonia-Arsuf is located in the northwestern part of the modern city of Herzliya on a kurkar (fossilized dune sandstone) ridge overlooking the Mediterranean (Fig. 1). The site lies 17 km north of Joppa and 34 km south of Caesarea. The ground of the eastern part of the site rises 35 m above sea level, and from there gently slopes down to the west, to about 20 m above sea level (Fig. 2).
The first systematic excavations at Apollonia-Arsuf were carried out in 1950, north of the medieval town wall on behalf of the Israel Department of Antiquities, first by I. Ben-Dor and then by P. Kahane. These salvage excavations were carried out against the establishment of the Israel Military Industries (IMI) plant that occupied great part of the site, leaving its western part relatively unharmed. While Ben-Dor excavated several trial trenches down to virgin soil, from which he ascertained that this part of the site never served as a residential area; discovering a series of three different types of winepress, which indicate that the site served as an industrial quarter of the Byzantine town. Kahane worked on a larger scale, throughout the entire area, in six different places, three of which provided substantial architectural remains. The excavator’s main discoveries included three types of structures belonging to three different periods, Late Roman tombs, Early Byzantine oil presses and Late Byzantine / Early Islamic raw glass furnaces. Unfortunately, the exact locations of the excavated areas of the 1950 season remains largely unknown. In 1962 and 1976, following development works at the IMI plant area, a polychrome mosaic floor and several bases of columns, located along an east-west axis, were uncovered (Area K), all belong to a Byzantine church.
The first large-scale excavations at Apollonia-Arsuf were carried out in 1977 by I. Roll who directed seventeen seasons of excavations at the site until 2004. The 1977 season was a salvage excavation on behalf of the Israel Department of Antiquities and Museums (in areas within the IMI plant), whereas only in 1982, the project became an academic excavation, on behalf of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University (in localities outside the IMI plant area). The 1996 season was a contract excavation, initiated by the legal owner of the entire area of Apollonia-Arsuf, the Israel Lands Authority, in areas within the IMI plant because of its planned evacuation. The request was to undertake a series of trial excavations in the area that extends from the Crusader town-gate (Area J) to the east, with the purpose of determining the maximum extension of the ancient site, and defining its eastern limits. From 1996 to this day all excavation seasons were carried out in localities outside the IMI plant area.
The 1998, 1999, and 2000 seasons excavations were organized as a joint venture of Tel Aviv University, Institute of Archaeology and the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul of Porto Alegre, Brazil with the financial backing of the Municipality of Herzliya and the Israel Nature and National Parks Protection Authority.
In 2001 the site of Apollonia-Arsuf became a national park. In 2004 the site was formally recognized as one of the 100 most endangered world monuments by the World Monuments Fund. In 2006 it was included in the tentative list of world heritage Crusader castles by UNESCO. In 2007 it became the case-study of a National Science Foundation grant, titled III-CXT-Core Large: Computer Vision Research: Promoting Paradigm Shifts in Archaeology (Grant #0808718). All these naturally emphasize the importance of continuing archaeological excavation and conservation (Fig. 3).
The 2001, 2002, and 2004 seasons excavations were organized as a sole venture of Tel Aviv University, Institute of Archaeology, while in 2006 an eighteenth season of excavations was carried out in conjunction with the Artemis and Martha Sharp Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology and the Ancient World of Brown University. This season was a transition during which the directorship and responsibility over the future excavations at Apollonia-Arsuf were transferred from I. Roll to O. Tal. In 2009 a nineteenth season of excavations at Apollonia-Arsuf was made. It was a fruit of collaboration between of Tel Aviv University, Institute of Archaeology and Brown University, Division of Engineering researchers (headed by David B. Cooper), partially funded by the National Science Foundation. Brown University researchers were responsible for computer vision research (digital archaeology), documenting of the site excavations, archaeological remains paradigm shifts for the promotion of the archaeological research in Israel and beyond.
While the 2010 (the twentieth) season ran independently as a study-dig of Tel Aviv University, Institute (and Department) of Archaeology, excavations at the site (the Apollonia National Park) from 2012 to 2016 were the fruit of collaboration between Tel Aviv University and the University of Tübingen (Germany) (headed by Prof. Dr. Barbara Scholkmann), partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), with the aim of investigating “The Crusader Town of Apollonia / Arsur (Israel): Structure – Cultural Adaptation – Urban-Rural Relations”. This joint project aimed at a better understanding of the European and local cultural influences that dictated the structure and organization of the town of Arsur and its hinterland. The town’s abandonment after its Mamluk destruction led to a unique archaeological setting in which the Crusader layers were left largely undisturbed by later settlement activities and thus are highly suitable for intensified archaeological research. These layers were the object of extensive light detection and ranging (LIDAR) analysis as well as geo-magnetic surveys, allowing the reconstruction of the original topography and the design of the entire medieval town by detecting the layout of structures still hidden below the ground. The finds from the excavations completed the picture gained through the surveys by allowing insights into the material culture and daily life activities of the town’s inhabitants.
The 2012 and 2013 (the twenty-first and twenty-second) seasons of excavations were also salvage excavations, initiated by the legal owner of the site’s eastern outskirts, the Israel Lands Authority. In a series of trial and rescue excavations in the area that extends outside the deserted IMI plant to the coastal highway (Road No. 2), made in collaboration with the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA), the site’s immediate hinterland was examined thoroughly in the face of future building developments therein. In 2017 collaboration with the IAA continued in rescue excavation in the national park area.
PERIODS OF OCCUPATION
The site of Apollonia-Arsuf was occupied as early as the Chalcolithic period and the Iron Age II but it is in the context of the Persian period that Apollonia-Arsuf became a coastal urban center, under Sidonian hegemony. We learn from the tomb inscription of Eshmun’azor 2nd, king of Sidon of the late 6th century BCE, that the Persian (Achaemenid) king, granted him Dor and Joppa, the mighty lands of grains in the Sharon Plain. This statement actually infers that the entire geographical unit of the Sharon Plain was in Sidonian hands, most probably as tribute for the participation of his fleet during the first Persian military campaigns to Egypt. Another historical reference that implies on the site’s administrative status is the Periplus of pseudo-Scylax (mid-4th century BCE), stating that both Dor and apparently Joppa are under Sidonian suzerainty. It seems thus that throughout its existence under Achaemenid rule Apollonia-Arsuf was subject to the Dor Province. Being the main town and haven of the southern Sharon Plain it became the chief commercial and probably industrial center of the region. The town’s dwellers, the Phoenicians, left their linguistic mark on the town by naming it after one of their gods, that is Resheph. Even though the town’s Phoenician name was not attested in writing and its conquerors and foreign inhabitants quickly renamed it, it nonetheless was not forsaken for at some later point, the Arabs reinstated the Semitic name, that is Arsuf which may suggest that in Persian times the site was named Arshoph. The Persian-period settlement is represented by two strata over an area of less than 20 dunams. These strata contain minor architectural remains, presumably domestic in nature, in Area H and a large refuse pit in Area D. The finds, ranging in date between the late 6th and late 4th centuries BCE, include mostly common pottery but also imported wares, fragments of male and female terracotta figurines and a fairly large number of Sidonian coins. A unique discovery is a 4th century BCE Pentelik marble relief (11 x 15 cm) of the Totenmahl (funerary banquet) type (Fig. 4). The scene depicts a bearded man in front view, dressed in a mantle and reclining on a couch (kline). In his right hand is an elongated object, probably a rhyton, while his left hand holds another object which may be aphiale. Opposite the man, seated at the left end of the couch, is a woman in profile with her hair bound in a sakkos, wearing a chiton and resting her feet on a footstool. In her left hand is a cup-like object, while her right hand apparently rests on her thigh. Behind the woman, two smaller figures stand in profile, facing the reclining man, their hands raised as if in worship: a bearded male and a veiled female, both dressed in a chiton. At the top left comer is a bust of a horse within a frame. At the lower right comer, the lower body of a krater is visible, next to an offering table with turned legs. Underneath the table, a coiled serpent stretches towards the reclining man. To the left of the table there is a pedestal-like altar. The presence of such an object at Apollonia-Arsuf should be attributed to the connections of the town with the Greek world (especially Attica), as is demonstrated by other archaeological finds retrieved from the site. The relief’s connection with a cult of a hero or the heroised mortal dead strongly suggests the presence of Greek individuals who practiced such a cult at the site. Whether this dead hero was buried at the site or in his homeland is impossible to determine, although one cannot exclude the presence of a Greek family who settled at the site and buried one of its commemorated members.
It is during the Hellenistic period that the site was renamed Apollonia. We have evidence that the Phoenician god Reshef was already identified with the Greek deity Apollo as early as the 4th century BCE. It is thus not surprising to learn that the site was affected by the region’s Hellenization or rather administrative and lingual revolution; Arshoph became Apollonia, Dor became Dora, and Joppa became Ioppe. Archaeologically, the settlement maintained the size of that of the Persian period and is represented by a single stratum with minor architectural remains in Area H, and a refuse pit in Area D. The finds, ranging in date between the late 4th and late 2nd centuries BCE, mostly include common pottery but also imported wares and stamped amphora handles. All indicate that the site was abandoned in Early Hasmonean times, apparently in the frame of Alexander Jannaeus territorial expansions in the Sharon Plain. The poor preservation of both the Persian and Hellenistic strata at the site is due to the intensive building activities in later periods.
It is in the Roman period that the site is first mentioned in the historical sources. Flavius Josephus lists Apollonia among the cities belonging to the Jews under Alexander Jannaeus together with Joppa. Pliny and Ptolemy list Apollonia among the coastal cities of Iudaea-Palaestina. The depiction of Apollonia on the Peutinger map along the coastal highway, between Joppa and Caesarea, indicates that it served as an official leg on the country’s Roman imperial road network. The most significant remains of the Roman period occupation at the site are undoubtedly those of a typical Roman villa of the peristyle type uncovered in Area E in the south part of the site. Located against the southern flank of the Early Islamic town wall, the villa was built on a platform carved out from the natural sandstone rock. Measuring some 21.5 x 24 m, the building was laid out in the precise directions of the four cardinal points. As the western facade of the dwelling faces the sea, it seems clear that this was a villa littorale, which could have belonged to a foreign rich merchant or a local magnate who may have undergone Romanization (Fig. 5).
A peristyle courtyard occupies the center of the building, which is surrounded by square piers supported by a stylobate. To its south is a long corridor that crosses the entire building from west to east. In the upper parts of two of the walls at the eastern end of the corridor are plastered niches that recall the lararia of the typical Italian dwelling. Three shorter corridors surround the other sides of the courtyard. The walls of the villa were remarkably well built, with large kurkar ashlars set into grey cement, which was the typical construction method of the Roman period (Fig. 6). On the whole, the structure was built according to the standard of the Latin foot (pes), which measures about 0.3 m. The thickness of the inner walls, with the exception of the walls of the peristyle, ranges between 0.4 and 0.45 m, corresponding to one cubitus (0.45 m). The central courtyard, with interior dimensions of ca. 6.45 x 3.85 m, corresponds to 22 x 13 pedes; and the corridors measuring 2.4 m on average correspond to 8 pedes. Overall, the interior dimensions of the rooms seem to correspond to the standard of the Latin foot as well. The villa’s design as an unfortified and isolated open dwelling facing the Mediterranean Sea was previously unknown in Iudaea.
This private structure, built to emphasize leisure, privacy, tranquility, social status, and economic wealth, clearly reflects an aspect of the Romanization of the coastal plain of Judaea that was apparent in the late 1st century CE. In a later phase of the villa’s use, the entrances to several rooms were intentionally blocked in a rather careless manner, perhaps indicating that several of the living rooms had been turned into storage rooms for more modest owners. The entire complex then suffered a sudden and violent destruction, probably caused by a devastating earthquake in 113/114 or 127/128 CE.
Most of the finds from the villa came from the later phase and include table, cooking and storage vessels, and local and imported lamps (Fig. 7). Smaller quantities of stone and glass vessels, bone objects and human and animals figurines were also discovered.
Another important Roman find is a gravestone with a Greek inscription. It has a rectangular frame, surmounted by a pediment with acroteria at the corners and a rosette inside the tympanum. It can be translated as follows: “Here lies Zoila, thirty years of age, who loved her husband. (Died in the year) 233, 26 of Apellaios. Courage” (Fig. 8). As previously mentioned, Flavius Josephus mentions Apollonia as one of the cities inhabited anew by the order of Gabinius, and the year 233 apparently refers to the Gabinian era which started in the year 57 BCE, indicating that 176 CE is the probable date of this inscription.
A polychrome mosaic floor and several column bases placed along an east-west line were uncovered in 1962 and 1976 in Area K. These elements belonged to a Byzantine church, of which only a part of the nave has survived. The preserved part of the pavement is decorated with stylized geometric and floral patterns, framed interwoven motifs, and birds inside round running medallions. The most impressive part of the mosaic floor is a three-line Greek inscription framed in a tabula ansata, intended to be read when facing east. The inscription is partly damaged but the following reading is suggested: “I am a church better than ambrosia and nectar, and Marinos erected me exalting God-extolled-for-His wisdom and ever ruling his pure and mystic spirit” (Fig. 9).
The inscription was formulated in dactylic-hexameter verse and has a clear poetic character. Its metaphoric language was meant to make a declaration – ostensibly by the church itself – that it was built by one Marinos who was well acquainted with classical Greek culture. Moreover, the words “ambrosia” and “nectar” point to a tradition reminiscent of the highest achievement of Greek literature, that is, the Homeric epic. However, the inscription also emphasizes, in a very clear manner, the superiority of the Christian Church over the classical tradition, which resulted from the Church’s ruling wisdom, pure nature and mystic spirituality. The decorative pattern of the compound and its inscription indicate a 5th-6th century CE date. This church may have served as the seat of the bishops of Sozousa, that is, Byzantine-period Apollonia. Other architectural remains attributed to the Byzantine period are confined primarily to a series of industrial installations such as water cisterns, wine- and oil-presses, primary glass kilns, and others of unclear function. The primary glass kilns, or furnaces, deserve special attention due to the relative rarity of these finds. Two glass furnaces were reported to have been excavated as early as 1950 by Kahane, but were attributed an Early Islamic date, another glass furnace was discovered during the 2002 season in Area N (Fig. 10), additional remains of furnace/s were discovered during the 2006 season in Area O, but this may already has been noted by Kahane in 1950, and the remains of yet another glass furnace were discovered in 2017 in Area N1. The best preserved and still visible example is the one discovered during the 2002 season in Area N. It immediately became apparent that this furnace is an isolated ashlar-built structure consisting of two parts: a melting chamber (of about 5.0 m x 3.8 m); and a firing area (of about 3.8 m x 1.6 m) with two conical-shaped firing chambers that opened onto the melting chamber. A large glass slab (about 4.45 x 2.95 m) was found on the melting chamber floor, which was separated from the firing area by a segmented stone wall. Extracting the slab required the roof of the installation to be dismantled after the glass had solidified and cooled. This was done by hammering and removing chunks of various sizes, as can be seen by the dents created on the preserved remains. The entire installation was overlain with fired mud-bricks. The high-quality raw glass that was extracted was transparent-blue and greenish-blue with a few bubbles. However, the glass from the preserved northwestern and southeastern corners of the melting chamber was yellowish-green and yellowish-brown, resulting from the amount of oxygen it absorbed (a high oxygen level leaves a bluish-greenish tinge and a low oxygen level renders a yellowish tinge). Numerous chunks of raw glass were discovered during the excavations. We may assume that chunks of insufficient weight or size for trade were discarded; they were probably removed from the slab while it was being extracted. We also found under the glass furnace a few pottery body fragments from a well-known type of Palestinian bag-shaped jar of Late Byzantine date. The firing chambers in the glass furnace from Apollonia-Arsuf were located on the west, and the melting chamber was on the east. The two firing chambers facing west were open to sea winds, thus facilitating the airflow that otherwise would have required the use of bellows. The roof of the melting chamber was probably vaulted, with a few openings (or chimneys) to provide better air circulation. The complete furnaces found at the site (in 1950 and 2002) together with the remains of the ones discovered in other seasons (2009, 2017) suggest that these were built in clusters, similarly to those exposed in Beth Eliezer, and operated simultaneously or for a relatively brief period because they were installations that had to be dismantled upon completion of manufacturing the raw glass to remove the product from the furnace. At the current state of research, we can conclude that raw glass furnaces from the Late Byzantine period were constructed on the southern and northern fringes of the site.
Reference must be made to other important Byzantine finds that were found at the site during the 1880s:
- A marble statue of a standing eagle with contracted wings, with a monogram that reads ΙΟΥΛΙΑΝΟΣ, apparently referring to the Byzantine emperor Julian (361-363 CE).
- A fragment of a marble relief showing the lower part of two horse legs. This iconographic document, albeit fragmentary, is of great importance because it is directly related to the contentious issue of when and where the common use of horseshoes began.
- A wide limestone lintel of a tomb which bears a Greek inscription that reads “One is the living God. Babas (son) of Maximus, grandson of Kosmas, made the burial monument for Marcellina Justina.”
The historical documentation of Early Islamic Arsuf is supported by several archaeological finds. Long stretches of the town wall were uncovered in the southern and western parts of the site (Areas E and H) and the earliest finds unearthed in the inner adjoining rooms date to the reign of the Ummayyad Caliph ‘Abd el-Malik (685-705 CE). The initial phase of a market street, of which a section of some 65 m have been uncovered, was exposed in the eastern part of the site (Areas B and C) (Fig. 11).
Various buildings flanking both sides of the street and serving as shops and food-stalls date to the same period. These finds indicate that Early Islamic Arsuf became a fortified town, with a large part of it having been rebuilt according to a comprehensive urban plan already at this early stage.
Excavations in the Crusader town-gate (Area J) revealed two construction phases of the town-gate, both from the Crusader period (Fig. 12).
Large-scale excavations were conducted in the Crusader castle (Area F), exposing practically all the components of the castle’s latest phase (Fig. 13). These include the following elements described from the inside outward: (1) a central irregular courtyard surrounded by broad halls; (2) the main pentagonal fortification complex, including a gate protected by two semicircular towers with an additional semicircular tower on each side in the east, and a donjon and two square corner towers in the west; (3) an external fortification with a contour corresponding largely to that of the main fortification but at a lower elevation and with a wider opening ; (4) a broad, deep moat bounded by an outer retaining wall; (5) a system of vaulted halls and retaining walls along the cliff at the western facade of the fortress, which largely collapsed falling to the base of the ridge; and, finally (6) a maritime installation, of which the foundations of the northern and southern breakwaters have been preserved. A particularly unique find published by the Italian scholar S. Paoli in 1733 is the official seal of Balian of Ibelin’s short lordship (1258-1261 CE) found in Malta.
Its reproduction shows a fully armored knight brandishing his sword and galloping to the right on a caparisoned horse (Fig. 14). The surrounding inscription reads: “Ba(lian) d’Ybel(in) s(eigneur) d’Ars(ur) co(n)establ(e) dou reaume d(e) I(e)r(usa)l(e)m” (= “Balian of Ibelin, lord of Arsur, constable of the kingdom of Jerusalem”). The other side depicts a castle with crenellated fortifications, as well as two corner towers and a gate dominated by a central donjon. The inscription around it reads: “Ce est le chastiau d(‘)Arsur” (= “This is the castle of Arsur”). The reproduced document, though schematic, provides a unique iconographical representation of the lord of Arsur and his castle.
In mid-March 1265 CE a large and well-prepared Muslim army under the personal command of Baybars laid siege to Arsur. From the Crusader’s point of view, Arsur was relatively well prepared. Its town and castle were strongly fortified, well-provisioned, and defended by some 2,000 warriors, with about 270 of them belonging to the Brothers of the Order. Excavations show that during the Mamluk siege, tons of dirt was intentionally piled against the interior walls of the Crusader town fortifications, and buildings built against these fortifications were intentionally covered with dirt in order to strengthen them. A stone and cement foundation (3-m-wide and 17-m-long) found in Area P seems to have been built on that occasion and may have been used to convey ballista machinery. On April 26, 1265 CE, after forty days of siege, a concerted attack was carried out and the town was taken by storm. The surviving defenders took refuge in the castle and continued to fight with superb courage. However, after three more days of fierce fighting, Muslim warriors took control of part of the castle’s fortifications and were able to raise the banners of Islam over the walls. The Hospitallers, after having lost up to 1,000 warriors including 90 knights, asked to surrender on the condition that the survivors would be free to leave. Baybars at first agreed but then broke his word and all of them were taken into slavery. Moreover, he forced the Christian prisoners to participate in the systematic demolition of their own stronghold. The entire site of Arsur was razed to the ground and left in ruins. This final destruction is largely attested by thick conflagration layers and ruins that were uncovered in the excavated areas all over the fortified site in general, and in the castle in particular. A unique discovery found in the Crusader castle is the refuse pit of the besieged containing numerous local and imported pottery vessels (Fig. 15), plain and luxury glass vessels, metal and stone artifacts, as well as considerable amount of animal bones (from which chicken bones are predominant). The importance of this assemblage lies in its absolute dating, March-April 1265 CE.
RECENT DISCOVERIES IN LAND
One of our main discoveries came from Area O in the north part of the site, where a large mosaic floor winepress (9.8 x 7.5 m) was uncovered with a Greek inscription in the center of its treading floor (in the 2006 and especially the 2009 season). The inscription reads: “One only god, help / Cassianos together with (his) wife / and children and everyone.” The inscription’s formula and the finds we discovered during excavations in the area point to Samaritan ownership of the complex in Byzantine times (5th-6th centuries CE) (Fig. 16). The winepress’ settling (fermentation) pit (about 3 x 2.2.5 m) is among the largest ever discovered in Israel. Based on the archaeological evidence the winepress ceased to function in the first half of the 6th century CE (possibly in relation to the Samaritan revolt [529 CE]). The winepress was damaged by an earthquake (apparently that of 749 CE), that is after its abandonment.
In the Crusader castle (Area F), which is the prominent architectural complex of the site, the 2009, 2010 and 2012 seasons of excavations were focused on the western part on top of the coastal cliff, in order to expose subterranean complexes and remove part of the dirt load from the cliff in order to facilitate future arrangements for better rainfall drainage (Fig. 17). The excavations uncovered parts of castle’s western façade and a series of subterranean halls aligned in a north–south axis. These are yet to be fully exposed from the debris of the fallen donjon where the castle’s chapel may have existed (Fig. 18). Evidence for post-destruction (1265 CE) occupation in this area is already apparent.
Excavations in the Crusader castle in 2012 also yielded a hoard of 106 Fatimid and two Zirid gold dinars and fractions (Fig. 19). While the hoard archaeological context corresponds to the castle destruction, the fact that it yields earlier Fatimid-period gold coins attests to a possibility that it may have been buried twice; first in the context of the site occupation by the Crusades in 1101 and second in the context of its destruction by the Mamluks in 1265.
In Area R, located in the center of the medieval walled town, and excavated in 2006, 2009 and 2010, we have uncovered an industrial installation of the Byzantine period that was later incorporated in a dwelling of the late Crusader period (13th century CE). This Crusader-period dwelling was partially uncovered. Its original foundations comprises of three rooms; two on the south and one on the east part of the excavated area. The two rooms on the south were found abandoned with complete and restorable pottery and glass vessels on their floors (Fig. 20), whereas the one on the east probably formed part of the courtyard and it revealed paved working surfaces and an intact clay oven (tabun). The upper layers we excavated in the Byzantine installation which later on became a refuse pit, included pottery and glass vessels of the Crusader period (12th-13th centuries CE), whereas the lower layers included pottery and glass vessels of the Early Islamic period (8th-11th centuries CE). Still the only physical connection between the later building and the installation can be placed in the mid-13th century CE based on the pottery and glass finds; The coins evidence suggests that the building was abandoned in the context of the Mamluk conquest of the site (March-April 1265).
Additional Crusader-period dwellings were also unearthed in Areas T and U after being mapped in magnetic survey and excavated in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 in the southern part of the walled town. The plans of these buildings comprise of a central courtyard surrounded by rooms of different size and function, and their history of occupation goes back to the Early Islamic and Byzantine periods. Excavations in Area partially unearthed three domestic complexes from the Early Islamic period that remained largely unchanged in Crusader times. On a whole the domestic complexes features show some regularity with courtyard (open spaces) on their west adjacent to cooking/storage areas. The area exhibits signs of destruction in the 12th century, possibly in the context of the site Ayyubid occupation (1187), as was also noticed in the nearby domestic complexes of Area E, north (inside the wall), where we also unearthed an oil press of the Crusader period. On top of this layer a new complex was built in the area’s western part. An assemblage of complete and restorable in situ pottery vessels were recovered from this complex, attesting (together with other finds) on a planned abandonment apparently in the context of the Mamluk siege of 1265 (Fig. 21).
Excavation in Area U (located in relative proximity to the southern and western fortifications) began in 2012 and ended in 2013, and provided evidence of continuous inhabitation from the Byzantine to the Crusader period. Floors of kurkar (fossilized dune sandstone) ashlars and a rudimentary white mosaic with reddish panels, as well as a collection of finds attest to the area utilization in the Byzantine period. During the Early Islamic period a rectangular built enclosure divided by few partition walls was erected whose finds attest to a domestic character. Noteworthy is a vaulted cesspit close to its northeastern corner appended by a built sunken chamber. With the Crusader occupation early in the 12th century a few architectural changes in the complex were made especially in its eastern part. Scorch marks and intentional fills of rubble and earth material may suggest a destruction by the Ayyubids in 1187 and rebuilding by the Crusades in the early-mid-13th century. This is attested by the apparent levelling of the area’s eastern part, where a retaining wall set in opus spicatum was discovered. Occupation fills in the area’s upper level revealed 13th century finds. Some WWI militaria were also found in the area attesting to its use during the historically documented stay of British forces at the site from December 1917 to August 1918.
In Area S, located in the far western end of the site adjacent to the western section of the Early Islamic town wall and excavated in 2010, we have unearthed the remains of the wall, as well as its foundations. Excavations also uncovered a casemate of the wall whose floor was partially paved with blocks of stones. The floor was dated based on the pottery evidence to the Early Islamic period (8th-9th centuries CE). Earlier remains (namely industrial installations) dated to the Late Byzantine period that occupied the area prior to the foundation of the Early Islamic fortification system were also discovered. These were appended by a modest assemblage of decorative architectural items dated to the Late Byzantine period that were found out of context in the excavated area. These items point to the possibility that the area to its east, which is much elevated, occupied a public building or a manor house.
In Area L, located the southwestern corner tower of the Crusader town fortifications and excavated in 2010, we have uncovered the fortification system of the Crusader town on top of the fortification system of the Early Islamic town; both were in fact constructed upon Byzantine architectural remains.
In Area M, in the south part of the site, outside the walled town area, excavated in 2006 and 2009, we dug a large 6th-7th centuries CE refuse pit and under which a hoard of 4th-5th centuries CE bronze coins was revealed. The “crater” stretching between Area M and E, south, seems to be one of the main dumps of the town of Sozousa. Some 10 tons of Late Byzantine pottery was retrieved in the excavations of Area E and an additional 13 tons was sorted from Area M in the 2006 season alone! To these may be added glass and metal fragments and considerable amount of animal bones.
Area W, in the western part of the site, and excavated in 2012, formed a positive trial for the site’s magnetic survey. We have revealed a Late Byzantine / Early Islamic period silo built of perpendicular (headers) blocks (1.8 m inner diameter). At a certain stage, probably in the 7th century, the silo went out of use and formed a dumping facility were refused organic and un-organic matters were discarded (and occasionally burnt).
Works in additional newly opened areas were carried out in 2012 with the financial backing of the Israel Nature and National Parks Protection Authority in the context of a planned disabled pathway around the Apollonia National Park:
In Area P1 (an extension of Area P, excavated in the 2003, 2004 and 2006 seasons), segments of plastered wall structures apparently of the Late Byzantine and Early Islamic period, built (in part) upon earlier mosaic floor were uncovered under a thick layer of whitish mortar-like uneven paving close to top soil. The latter was apparently laid in the context of the defense works against the Mamluk attack, as it is located inside and opposite to the 21 m breach in the medieval town wall. Among the findings recovered are several Crusader/Mamluk period arrowheads identical to those recovered in the castle and a few lamps and coins of the same time frame (as found in Area P). The area’s upper level thus provide a material manifestation of Crusader defenders trying to avoid the Mamluk forces to burst into the town.
In the 2014 season an important discovery was made on the earlier mosaic floor, a bi-lingual inscription that was probably placed in the hall of a Samaritan synagogue of the Early Byzantine period; the inscription reads: “One only god / who helps / Gadiona / and Iulianus / and all who deserve it”; that of the Aramaic (written in Samaritan script) may be translated as “(made it from his) possession in this place.” (Fig. 22). In an attempt to locate the remains of the synagogue building, excavations in 2015 mange to detect its south and east walls although been used in later building remains.
In Area P2 which is a 5 x 5 m square dug across the moat (on its southern side) opposite to Area P1, we unearthed the outer wall of the Crusader-period moat to its full thickness (1.1 m). The area was found however cleaned of any findings.
In Area Q which is located across the Crusader castle’s moat where remains of the through bridge were recorded, digs seek at uncovering the main town-street that lead to the castle. Excavations in this area were followed by a geo-radar survey yet revealed no architectural remains but for some scattered building stones and patches of packed-earth floor. It seems that the Crusader-period street level was dismantled in the context of the Israel Military Industries plant development works.
In Area X which is located in the center of the walled town and upon the current visitors pathway, we cleaned an intact Early Islamic/Late Byzantine-period cistern of some 4 x 2 m and 4 m deep. The cistern holds two original openings, and it seems that it served a dwelling that awaits excavations.c
More areas of excavations were opened in the 2012 and 2013 seasons in a series of trial and rescue excavations in the fields that extends outside the deserted IMI plant to the coastal highway (Road No. 2). These were initiated by the legal owner of the site’s eastern outskirts, the Israel Lands Authority for the sake of future development works, and were made in collaboration with the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA; co-directed by E. Haddad and M. Ajami).
In Area AA a structure built of roughly hewn stones, identified as a field tower, was exposed. It consisted of two construction phases dating to the Byzantine and Early Islamic periods. A shift in the ground was apparent in the cross-section of the building, which is characteristic of structures founded on shifting sand dunes. Other discoveries included a partially preserved installation with a threshold stone abutted by two walls; a section of a paved road characterized by a layer of gravel; and a small elliptical refuse pit. Worn pottery sherds were found in the area along with several pieces of glass slag and other glass production debris. In Area AA1 several plastered installations were exposed, including round and square collecting vats paved with mosaics. The vats were part of a winepress in which two construction phases from the Byzantine period were discerned. In the early phase, the press included two small, round collecting vats; in the later phase it was expanded to three large vats, one rounded and the other two—square. The walls of the winepress were built of medium-sized kurkar stones bonded with grayish white mortar. The winepress had a treading floor, close to surface level, which was apparently destroyed by later activity. In the southern part of the area, several sections of a work surface built of medium-sized fieldstones, probably dating from the Byzantine or Early Islamic period, were exposed. A single pit grave excavated in the center of the area was aligned in an east–west direction and is identified as a Bedouin grave. In Area AA2 a structure built of roughly hewn stones set on a foundation of small fieldstones was exposed. The building, identified as a field tower, included two construction phases. Two Bedouin pit graves aligned along an east–west axis were excavated next to the tower. Two small refuse pits were exposed beneath the collapsed stones of the field tower. In a recess hewn in the kurkar bedrock, pottery sherds dating to the Persian period were discovered, probably representing the remains of another burial that did not survive. In Area AA3 a mausoleum was exposed; only the plastered floor and the remains of three burial troughs survived. Its walls were built of roughly hewn limestone blocks, and its foundation was constructed of fieldstones. Pottery sherds dating to the Late Roman or Early Byzantine period were found in the building and its immediate vicinity. Thus, this structure most likely dates to these periods.
In Area CC (the largest area of excavations in the site’s eastern outskirts) a huge refuse pit (diam. in excess of 30 m) dating to the Late Byzantine period was exposed. The stratification in the area was uniform: a surface layer of sand covered a layer of potsherds (maximal thickness c 1 m) and an underlying layer of alluvium. The pit contained numerous artifacts, including pottery vessels, glass sherds, glass industrial waste, metal objects and animal bones, as well as more than 200 complete Samaritan oil lamps and more than 700 coins. Althoughthe refuse pit is attributed to the second half of the Byzantine period, parts of it may have been used for short periods of time within this period. In Area CC2 the excavation yielded a wall built on virgin soil and aligned in a north–south direction. Pottery dating to the Byzantine period was found alongside it.
In Area DD a stone-built installation and a hearth constructed of small fieldstones were unerathed, whereas in Area DD1 the remains of a winepress were exposed, consisting of a section of a treading floor and two square, plastered vats situated to the west of the floor. The northern one was a shallow settling vat, from which liquid flowed through a plastered channel to the southern one, which was a deep collecting vat with a sump in its floor. Anomalies in the bedrock and rock-cut installations, the functions of which are unclear, were also exposed in the area. In Area DD2 the remains of four poorly preserved jars, probably used for jar burials, were found. Although randomly scattered throughout the area, the jars were interred along a north–south axis. They might have been used for (secondary?) burial, as their skeletal contents did not survive. Part of a kurkar outcrop with small hewn niches was exposed to the west of the jars. A refuse pit dating to the Byzantine period and containing pottery sherds and animal bones was discovered at the northeastern end of the area. And in Area DD3 a round, plastered collecting vat and the foundation of a treading floor of a poorly preserved winepress were exposed. Six tombs were found to the west of the winepress. They are dated to the Hellenistic and Early Roman periods on the basis of their contents, their spatial distribution and their construction method.
Other areas (AA4 and BB) yielded finds without architectural remains. At any rate the paucity of architectural finds despite the scope of the excavations (c. 300 dunams) indicates that the area served as an agricultural and industrial hinterland for the Byzantine settlement at Apollonia (Sozusa). The architectural remains in the area—winepresses, field towers, tombs and other installations—are few; however, based on their distribution it can be assumed that the area was used mainly for growing crops. While the refuse pits were utilized for the disposal of waste from the settlement, their content served as fertilizer to enrich the soil in the nearby fields. Although glass production debris was discovered in the excavation, no kilns were found. It seems that the kilns were located in the immediate vicinity of the Byzantine settlement, and the waste was transferred to the excavation areas for secondary use, as was done with building materials that were found in secondary use in several of the Late Byzantine, Early Islamic and Crusader periods structures. The finds from the excavations and their proximity to the settlement provide us with a deeper view into the relationship between a city and its agricultural hinterland during the Byzantine period.
A series of underwater surveys were conducted at the seaside remains of Apollonia-Arsuf by E. Grossmann. An underwater inspection team of the Israel Antiquities Authority headed by E. Galili also undertook sub-aquatic activities there. These surveys (carried out in the late 1980s and early 1990s) show that Apollonia-Arsuf possessed two maritime installations; a sheltered, partially built anchorage and a built facility at the foot of the Crusader castle (rectangular in plan, about 80 m from north to south and 33 m from east to west). In the sheltered anchorage opposite the fortified town the eastern face of the sandstone reef was carved and smoothed. Massive conglomerates, large blocks and ashlar stones were placed on the reef and near it, which denotes its role as a man-improved breakwater. In the sheltered anchorage area, a large number of stone anchors of various types were found, as well as sounding leads, and vessels and nails made of bronze. The more impressive finds include fragments of a life-size bronze statue of a male, a bronze statuette of the goddess Minerva, a lead strip (roof-tile?) with Greek letters, and a carved marble vase. The pottery assemblage found in the sheltered anchorage include sherds from the Persian, Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine periods, but fragments of storage jars and pithoi of the Byzantine period were most dominant. This brings to Grossman’s conclusion that Apollonia, an industrial center with overseas trade connections, had two contemporaneous maritime installations in Byzantine times; one for international trade and the other, smaller, serving local fishermen and coastal trade. This also indicates that the activity of the anchorage reached its peak in the Byzantine period, that is, at the same time when the town of Apollonia-Arsuf (then named Sozousa) reached its largest expansion. In the east of the anchorage near the coastline, the remains of a large structure were surveyed, which included large ashlars, as well as marble and granite columns. From the large quantity of Byzantine storage jar fragments found there, it seems that the building functioned as a Byzantine maritime storehouse. During Grossmann’s survey of the maritime installation located at the foot of the Crusader castle, mortar samples from the jetties were subjected to chemical tests and analyzed. The tests show that, although the jetties proper date to the Crusader period, their foundations were laid much earlier, in Byzantine times. Moreover, the foundations of the northern pier seem to have been built in a way similar to the harbor building method described by Vitruvius (V, 12, 2-6). It is worth noting that the entrance to both maritime installations (the sheltered anchorage and the built facility) open towards the southwest. The entrance to the anchorage is a natural opening in the sandstone reef, whereas in the built facility it is clearly man-made. This southwest location for the entrances differs radically from the other harbors in Palestine, both past and present, where the entrance faces northwest. This is done to prevent the south-to-north long-shore current, which is prevalent the Eastern Mediterranean coast bringing with it sediment from the Nile Delta, from entering the harbors. However, it seems that at Apollonia-Arsuf, the opposite (southwest) location for the entrance was preferred, with the idea of permitting the entry of the long-shore current into the harbor. This can be explained by a geological observation of three nodal points along the Israeli coast, one of them close to Apollonia-Arsuf, where the sea current reverses and runs in a southerly direction. Most probably also in antiquity the current along this shore ran in the same, reversed, direction, this being the explanation for the unusual placing of the harbor entrances facing south, for the purpose of de-silting by natural current action. Alternatively, a more sophisticated rationale may have been to counteract seaborne sedimentation allow current-driven de-silting of its basin. In this case, the gaps left across the foundations of the northern pier in the built facility at the foot of the Crusader castle (possibly by wooden forms, placed there in compliance with the Vitruvian method) could have served as flushing channels. If so, it is not clear at all whether the system worked at the time or not.
In an attempt to elucidate the functionality of the maritime installation at the foot of the Crusader castle, underwater excavation was carried out in 2013, which formed part of a greater project, headed by D. Mirkin, of investigating Crusader seamanship. The underwater excavation focused however on two main topics: one concerned the study and analysis of the massively built northern and southern walls (breakwaters), as well as the western wall, consisting of a natural reef with some remnants of masonry; the second concerned studying and analyzing the seabed. The results show that its builders were familiar with marine building techniques and its original depth could host shallow crafts that could be ‘walked in’ into its basin despite its narrow and difficult entrance. Once a boat had managed to find its way into the area protected by the walls, preferably owing to local knowledge, it was relatively safe. Still, debate over whether or not the maritime installation actually served as a mooring basin has yet to be resolved, and there are valid points to be made both for and against. However, most probably it could hardly qualify as a harbor. It may be added that sub-bottom sonar survey carried out in 2011 indicated a few anomalies outside this installation that may represent medieval shipwrecks based on 14C analysis of organic remains.
WORLD WAR I REMAINS
The site of Apollonia-Arsuf played a role during WWI, as in the 22nd-23rd December 1917 a new British line was formed by the British troops at the site. The evidence on the new line and the entrenchment of the troops therein is given in cases first hand; a testimony of a man who fought at Arsuf is recorded in E. Thompson (Crusader’s Coast, London 1929, 12-25): “Vaults and masonry, that served us for makeshift trenches, are overgrown with datura and scrub; … Will the archaeologist of later ages, examining pillars and tumbled castle, think of us who burrowed in rock-tombs and hid in caves at the cliff root, while the 5,9’s [i.e. 150 mm cannon] rapped on the flowery pastures overhead?” (Thompson 1929, 24-25). Another testimony on Arsuf is documented in W.T. Massey (How Jerusalem Was Won: Being the Record of Allenby’s Campaign in Palestine, London 1919, 235-236): “At a later date, when digging at Arsuf, these Scots came across some marble columns which had graced a hall when Apollonia was in its heyday. The glory of Apollonia has long vanished, but if in that age of warriors there had been a belief that those marble columns would some day be raised as monuments to commemorate a great operation of war the ancients would have had a special veneration for them. Three of the columns marked the spots where the Scots spanned the river, and it is a pity that they cannot tell the full story to succeeding generations.” Indeed these Proconnesian marble columns that probably originated in a Byzantine Apollonia/Sozousa became three memoranda on which inscriptions were carved commemorating the deeds of the 155th, 156th and 157th Brigades of the 52nd Division against the Turks, while crossing the Yarkon (Nahr el ‘Auja) river erected in three different respected locations of the crossing, i.e. at Tell Qudadi (on the north bank of the Yarkon estuary), Kikar Hill (Giv’at Beth HaMitbchahim) and Ramat Gan (in the intersection of Ben Gurion and Aba Hillel Streets), and visible to this very day.
The material evidence of troops staying and training at the site between late December 1917 to September 1918 is attested by many finds, among which are ammunition containers, canned food, fragmented helmets, cartridges, musket/shrapnel balls, bullets, etc. Relatively often buttons of cloths were discovered. One of the more interesting finds was a kit of morphine ampoules still intact (Fig. 23) in the upper levels of the excavated Area S (above). On the aerial photographs the emplacements of the troops are visible.
The Apollonia-Arsuf excavation is an on-going research project. We intend to continue excavations at Apollonia-Arsuf in order to gain better understanding on the site’s economic basis and political affinity, as well as its cultural and economic interactions with other Mediterranean centers during its periods of successive occupation. The mention of the site in several historical sources for the Roman period on the one hand, and the limited extent of architectural remains discovered in the excavations on the other, invite us to examine further the reasons for its historical importance at this time. As the central site for primary (and probably secondary) glass production on the coastal plain in the Byzantine period, we intend to map all the furnaces discovered at the site in order to track chronological sequences and chemical compositional differences. We also intend to continue unearthing specific elements of the Crusader castle (such as the moat and western halls) for a better understanding of its architectural plan. Furthermore, we wish to investigate further the site’s underwater archaeology. The results of the recent seasons provide a better understanding of the site and in particular the social and occupational history of the Early Byzantine and Crusader periods.
Israel Roll (1937-2010) (in memoriam)
Co-Director – Barbara Scholkmann
Field Director (German Team) – Annette Zeischka-Kenzler
Field Director (Israeli Team) – Hagi Yohanan
Landscape Archaeology – Hauke Kenzler / Rafael Lewis
Registrar – Tamar Harpak
Surveyor – Slava Pirsky
Photographer – Pavel Shrago
Volunteers Coordinator – Ilan Shachar
Robert Kool / Gabriela Bijovsky – Numismatics
Itamar Taxel / Elisabeth Yehuda – Pottery
Marcio Teixeira Bastos – Lychnologist (and thin-section analysis)
Mark Iserlis – Thin-section Analysis
Ruth Jackson-Tal – Glass
Ian Freestone – Glass Analysis
Moshe Fischer – Architectural Decoration (classical periods)
Vardit Shotten-Hallel – Architect / Architectural Decoration (medieval periods)
Stefan Heidemann / Nitzan Amitai-Preiss – Islamic Epigraphy
Lidar Sapir-Hen / Miriam Pines – Archaeozoology
Nili Liphschitz / Andrea Orendi – Archaeobotany
Henk Mienis / Oz Rittner – Mollusks
Arno Patzelt / Martin Waldhör – Geophysical Surveying
Alexander Glik – WWI Militaria
Roll, I. and Ayalon, E. 1989. Apollonia and Southern Sharon: Model of a Coastal City and its Hinterland. Tel Aviv. (Hebrew).
Gophna, R. and Ayalon, E. 1998. Archaeological Survey of Israel: Map of Herzliyya (69). Jerusalem.
Roll, I. and Tal, O. 1999. Apollonia-Arsuf: Final Report of the Excavations. Volume I: The Persian and Hellenistic Periods (with Appendices on the Chalcolithic and Iron Age II Remains). Tel Aviv University, Monograph Series of the Institute of Archaeology 16. Tel Aviv.
[Final Reports in Preparation]
Tal, O. Apollonia-Arsuf: Final Report of the Excavations. Volume II: Excavations Outside the Medieval Walls (2002, 2006, 2009, 2017) and in the Hinterland (1996, 2012, 2013).
Tal, O. and Scholkmann, B. eds. Final Report of the Excavations. Volume III: Crusader Arsur. Excavations Directed by I. Roll (1977-2006) and O. Tal (2006-2016).
Roll, I., Tal, O. and Winter, M. eds. 2007. The Encounter of Crusaders and Muslims in Palestine as Reflected in Arsuf, Sayyiduna ‘Ali and Other Coastal Sites. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz HaMeuchad (Hebrew).
Tal, O. ed. 2011. The Last Supper at Apollonia: The Final Days of the Crusader Castle in Herzliya. Tel Aviv: Eretz Israel Museum. (Bi-lingual Hebrew/English).
Amitai, R. 2005. The Conquest of Arsuf by Baybars: Political and Military Aspects. Mamluk Studies Review 9: 61-83.
Amitai-Preiss, N. and Tal, O. 2015. A Lead Bulla from Apollonia-Arsūf with the Place Name Arsūf; Ashkenazi, D. and Tal, O. Appendix: Archaeometallurgical Characteristics of the Bulla. Israel Numismatic Research 10: 191-206.
Ashkenazi, D., Golan, O. and Tal, O. 2013. An Archaeometallurgical Study of 13th-Century Arrowheads and Bolts from the Crusader Castle of Arsuf/Arsur. Archaeometry 54/6: 528-548.
Ayalon, E., Tal, O. and Yehuda, L. 2013. A Twelfth Century Oil Press Complex at the Crusader Town of Arsur (Apollonia) and the Olive Oil Industry in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1/4: 259-291.
Birnbaum, R. and Ovadiah, A. 1990. A Greek Inscription from the Early Byzantine Church at Apollonia. Israel Exploration Journal 40: 182-191.
Fischer, M. and Tal, O. 2003. A Fourth-Century BCE Attic Marble Totenmahlrelief at Apollonia-Arsuf. Israel Exploration Journal 53: 49-60.
Freestone, I.C., Jackson-Tal, R.E. and Tal, O. 2008. Raw Glass and the Production of Glass Vessels at Late Byzantine Apollonia-Arsuf, Israel. Journal of Glass Studies 50: 67-80.
Galili, E., Dahari, U. and Sharvit, J. 1992. Underwater Survey along the Coast of Israel. Excavations and Surveys in Israel 10: 160-166.
Galili, E., Dahari, U. and Sharvit, J. 1993. Underwater Survey and Rescue Excavations along the Israeli Coast. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 22: 61-77.
Galor, K., Roll, I. and Tal, O. 2009. Apollonia-Arsuf: Between Past and Future. Near Eastern Archaeology 72/1: 4-27.
Grossmann, E. 2001. Maritime Tel Michal and Apollonia: Results of the Underwater Survey 1989-1996. BAR International Series 915. Oxford.
Haddad, E., Tal, O., Ajami, M. and Harpak, T. 2015. Apollonia (East). Ḥadashot Arkheologiyot—Excavations and Surveys in Israel 127.
Jackson-Tal, R.-E. and Tal, O. 2013. Crusader Glass in Context: The Destruction of Arsur (Apollonia-Arsuf, Israel), April 1265. Journal of Glass Studies 55: 85-100.
Kahane, P. 1951. Rishpon (Apollonia); B. Bulletin of the Department of Antiquities of the State of Israel 3: 42-43 (Hebrew). [For English summary see Perkins 1951, below].
Kaplan, E.H. and Kaplan, B. 1975. The Diversity of Late-Byzantine Oil Lamps at Apollonia (=Arsuf). Levant 7: 150-156.
Kenzler, H. 2016. Medieval Town Structure of Arsur on the Basis of Non-Invasive Methods: Results of German-Israeli Project Collaboration. Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 132/2: 151-174.
Kenzler, H. Scholkmann, B. and Zeischka-Kenzler, A. 2014. Arsur – Stadt der Kreuzfahrer. Archäologie in Deutschland 4: 12-17.
Kenzler, H. and Zeischka-Kenzler, A. 2015. Reports: German-Israeli Research on the Crusader Town of Arsur and Its Former Lordship. The European Archaeologist – Issue 43: 72-79.
Khalilieh, S. H. 1999. The Ribat System and its Role in Coastal Navigation. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 42: 212-225.
Khalilieh, S. H. 2008. The Ribāt of Arsūf and the Coastal Defence System in Early Islamic Palestine. Journal of Islamic Studies19/2: 159-177.
Kool, R. and Tal, O. 2015. ‘Underground’ Money in an Outremer Estate: Token Molds and Lead Tokens from Crusader Arsur. Israel Numismatic Research 10: 215-228.
Mirkin, D., Cvikel, D. and Tal, O. 2016. Arsur Castle Maritime Installation (1241-1265 CE). Palestine Exploration Quarterly 148/4: 294-312.
Perkins, A. 1951. Archaeological News: The Near East. American Journal of Archaeology 55: 86-87.
Pines, M., Sapir-Hen, L. and Tal, O. 2017. Crusader Diet in Times of War and Peace: Arsur (Israel) as a Case Study. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 36/3: 307-328.
Raphael, K. and Tepper, Y. 2005. The Archaeological Evidence from the Mamluk Siege of Arsuf. Mamluk Studies Review 9: 85-100.
Roll, I. 1996. Medieval Apollonia-Arsuf: A Fortified Coastal Town in the Levant of the Early Muslim and Crusader Periods. In: Balard, M. ed. Autour de la première Croisade. Actes du Colloque de la Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East (Clermont-Ferrand, 22-25 juin 1995). Paris: 597-606.
Roll, I. 2006. Apollonia-Arsuf: A Coastal Town of the Eastern Mediterranean Shore in Early Christian and Byzantine Times. In: Harreither, R. et al. Akten des XIV Internationalen Kongresses für Christlische Archäologie. Wien: 681-685.
Roll, I. 2008. Der frühislamische Basar und die Kreuzfahrerburg in Apollonia-Arsuf. In: Piana, M. ed. Burgen und Städte der Kreuzzugszeit. Petersberg: 252-262.
Roll, I. and Arubas, B. 2006. Le château d’Arsur: Forteresse côtière pentagonale du type concentrique du milieu du XIIIe siècle. Bulletin Monumental 164/1: 67-81.
Roll, I. and Ayalon, E. 1987. The Market Street at Apollonia-Arsuf. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 267: 61-76.
Roll, I. et al. 2000. Apollonia-Arsuf during the Crusader Period in Light of New Discoveries. Qadmoniot 33: 18-31. (Hebrew).
Roll, I. and Tal, O. 2008. A Villa of the Early Roman Period at Apollonia-Arsuf. Israel Exploration Journal 58: 132-149.
Roll, I. and Tal, O. 2009. A New Greek Inscription from Byzantine Apollonia-Arsuf / Sozousa: A Reassessment of the Heis Theos Monos Inscriptions of Palestine. Scripta Classica Israelica 28: 139-147.
Sapir-Hen, L., Pines, M. and Tal, O. 2014. Animal Economy and Social Diversity in Byzantine Apollonia/ Sozousa. Levant 46/3: 371-381.
Shachar, I. 2000. Greek Colonization and the Eponymous Apollo. Mediterranean Historical Review 15/2: 1-26.
Sussman, V. 1983. The Samaritan Oil Lamps from Apollonia-Arsuf. Tel Aviv 10: 71-96.
Tal, O. 1995. Roman-Byzantine Cemeteries and Tombs around Apollonia. Tel Aviv 22: 107-120.
Tal, O. 2000. Some Notes on the Settlement Patterns of the Persian Period Southern Sharon Plain in Light of Recent Excavations at Apollonia-Arsuf. Transeuphratène 19: 115-125.
Tal, O. 2009. A Portable Sundial from Byzantine Apollonia-Arsuf / Sozousa? Semitica et Classica 2: 91-96.
Tal, O. 2009. A Winepress at Apollonia-Arsuf: More Evidence on the Samaritan Presence in Roman-Byzantine Southern Sharon. Liber Annuus 59: 319-342.
Tal, O. 2010. Apollonia-Arsuf 2006, 2009. Israel Exploration Journal 60: 107-114.
Tal, O. 2015. A Bilingual Greek-Samaritan Inscription from Apollonia-Arsuf/Sozousa: Yet More Evidence of the Use of εἷς θεὸς μόνος Formula Inscriptions among the Samaritans. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 194: 169-175.
Tal, O. and Baidoun, I. 2010. A Hoard of Mamluk, Ottoman and Venetian Coins (Fifteenth to Sixteenth Centuries) from Apollonia-Arsuf, Israel. Numismatic Chronicle 170: 484-493.
Tal, O., Jackson-Tal, R.E. and Freestone, I.C. 2004. New Evidence of the Production of Raw Glass at Late Byzantine Apollonia-Arsuf, Israel. Journal of Glass Studies 46: 51-66.
Tal, O., Kool, R. and Baidoun, I. 2013. A Hoard Twice Buried? Fatimid Gold from Thirteenth Century Crusader Arsur (Apollonia-Arsuf). Numismatic Chronicle 173: 261-292.
Tal, O. and Taxel, I. 2012. Socio-Political and Economic Aspects of Refuse Disposal in Late Byzantine and Early Islamic Palestine. In: Matthews, R., Curtis, J., et al. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, 12-16, April 2010. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz GmbH & Co. Pp. 497-518.
Tal, O. and Taxel, I. 2017. More Than Trash – Cultic Use of Pottery Lamps Found in Late Antique Dumps: Apollonia (Sozousa) as a Test Case. In: Tal, O. and Weiss, Z., eds. Expressions of Cult in the Southern Levant in the Greco-Roman Period: Manifestations in Text and Material Culture. Contextualizing the Sacred 6. Turnhout: Brepols. Pp. 181-193.
Taragan, H. 2004. The Tomb of Sayyidnā ‛Alī in Arsūf: The Story of a Holy Place. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 14: 83-102.
Tal, O. and Teixeira Bastos, M. 2012. Intentionally Broken Discus Lamps from Roman Apollonia: A New Interpretation. Tel Aviv 39/1: 105-115.
Tal, O. and Teixeira Bastos, M. 2015. More on the Intentionally Broken Discus Lamps from Roman Palestine: Mutilation and Its Symbolic Meaning. In: Blömer, M., Lichtenberger, A. and Raja, R. eds. Religious Identities in the Levant from Alexander to Muhammed: Continuity and Change. Contextualizing the Sacred 4. Turnhout: Brepols. Pp. 345-368.
Wexler, L. and Gilboa, G. 1994. A Signet Ring from the Apollonia-Arsuf Excavations. Tel Aviv 21: 288-291.
Wexler, L. and Gilboa, G. 1996. Oil Lamps of the Roman Period from Apollonia-Arsuf. Tel Aviv 23: 115-131.